Kimzey v. Interpace Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying dual-persona doctrine and noting that “[pjlaintiff s action is essentially an attempt to recover from a third-party manufacturer of a defective machine through a suit against its successor corporation.”
• applying dual-persona doctrine and noting that \[p]laintiff's action is essentially an attempt to recover from a third-party manufacturer of a defective machine through a suit against its successor corporation.\
• basing allowance of civil claim against third person on K.S.A. 1983 Supp. 44-504[a]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).