Skip to main content
· 7/19/1991

Kimmins Abatement v. Conestoga-Rovers

Citations

  • 601 A.2d 256
  • 253 N.J. Super. 162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that entire controversy doctrine did not bar second lawsuit against defendant who was not party to first lawsuit in another state

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.