· 7/19/1991
Kimmins Abatement v. Conestoga-Rovers
Citations
- 601 A.2d 256
- 253 N.J. Super. 162
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that entire controversy doctrine did not bar second lawsuit against defendant who was not party to first lawsuit in another state
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.