Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that court should not consider only specific statute in question, but rather should consider entire legislative scheme of which it is part
• directing that interpretation of a statute must center upon its structure and plain language
• finding that a civil penalty in excess of $100,000 was appropriate in an antitrust action where the defendants had conspired to rig bids, fix prices, and allocate territories for construction projects
• stating “[i]n discerning [legislative] intent we consider not only the particular statute in question, but also the entire legislative scheme of which it is a part”
• noting it was the Court's \first decision relating to the calculation of civil penalties\ and \delineat[ing] some of the factors that courts should consider in setting civil penalties\
• discussing civil penalties under the New Jersey Antitrust Act, N.J.S.A. 56:9-1 to -19

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).