Skip to main content
· 7/2/1997

Kimmel v. Safeco Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 696 A.2d 482
  • 116 Md. App. 346
  • 1997 Md. App. LEXIS 117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “On several occasions, this Court has also held that, when a claim is disputed, acceptance of payment, coupled with knowledge that payment is intended fully to satisfy a disputed claim, constitutes an accord and satisfaction that bars any further recovery.”
  • “If the trial court did not specify the grounds upon which it granted summary judgment, appellate courts assume that the trial court carefully considered all of the asserted grounds and determined that all or at least enough of them ... were meritorious.” (internal quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hollander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.