E.D. Pennsylvania· 7/31/1979
Kimbrough v. Holiday Inn
Citations
- 478 F. Supp. 566
- 28 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 376
- 1979 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10694
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that compulsory arbitration programs do not “impose conditions so burdensome or so onerous that it interferes with the rights guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment”
- a party similarly situated to the plaintiff in this case was assessed as a penalty the amount of the arbitration fees
- compulsory nonbinding arbitration as prerequisite to judicial proceedings does not violate right to trial by jury as guaranteed by Seventh Amendment
- “Reform can proceed one stage at a time.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ditter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1984-12-24· cited 60×
- Michael B. Tiedel v. Northwestern Michigan College, a Not-For-Profit Corporation, Beech Aircraft Corporation, a CorporationSixth Circuit· 1988-12-29· cited 30×
- SCI Management Corp. v. SimsHawaii Supreme Court· 2003-07-09· cited 27×
- Fisher v. EdgertonCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-09-30· cited 14×
- New England Merchants National Bank v. HughesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1983-02-10· cited 10×
- McKay v. Ashland Oil, Inc.E.D. Kentucky· 1988-04-08· cited 6×
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-05-06· cited 4×
- United States v. Cherry Hill Textiles, Inc.Court of International Trade· 1995-05-30· cited 1×
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1969-04-21· cited 3,119×
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court· 1955-05-09· cited 2,938×
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court· 1932-02-23· cited 1,799×
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,740×
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court· 1966-01-18· cited 1,071×
- Gasoline Products Co. v. Champlin Refining Co.Supreme Court· 1931-05-18· cited 659×
- Ex Parte PetersonSupreme Court· 1920-06-01· cited 576×
- Galloway v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-06-21· cited 469×
- Ballew v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1978-03-21· cited 316×
- Texas Petroleum Co. v. Compania Pelineon De Navegacion, S. A.Supreme Court· 1977-01-10· cited 276×
- Colgrove v. BattinSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 262×
- Everett v. GoldmanSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1978-05-22· cited 218×
- State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court· 1978-01-03· cited 211×
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1902-12-01· cited 207×
- Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court· 1977-09-27· cited 186×
- Prendergast v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court· 1977-07-20· cited 136×
- Parker v. Children's Hospital of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1978-11-01· cited 126×
- Smith CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1955-03-23· cited 119×
- Paro v. Longwood HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1977-11-16· cited 116×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.