Skip to main content
· 9/21/1948

Kimbrell v. Dallman

Citations

  • 80 F. Supp. 695
  • 37 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 720
  • 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[E]ven where a court determines that Rule 11(b) has been violated, the decision whether to impose sanctions is not mandatory, but rather is a matter for the court's discretion.”
  • “Rule 11 and principles of due process require that ‘the subject of a sanctions motion be informed of: (1) the source of authority for the sanctions being considered; and (2
  • “[I]n order to determine the moving Defendants’ Rule 11 motion, the Court would be required to resolve whether or not the alleged fraud that Lorber accused the moving Defendants of participating in actually occurred.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Briggle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.