Kimble v. Marvel Entertainment, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the words \ 'restraint of trade' \ in the Sherman Act have been interpreted dynamically
• holding that, although one litigant “also [sought] support from the wellspring of all patent policy: the goal of promoting innovation[,] . .. . [c]laims that a statutory precedent has serious and harmful consequences for innovation are (to repeat this opinion’s refrain
• noting that once a court engages in statutory interpretation, it is up to Congress “for acceptance or not as that branch elects”
• holding challenged precedent had not proved unworkable because “[t]he decision is simplicity itself to apply”
• holding challenged precedent had not proved unworkable because “[t]he decision is simplicity itself to apply”
• holding challenged precedent had not proved unworkable because “[t]he decision is simplicity itself to apply”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).