Kimberly W. Wadhams v. Raymond K. Procunier Michael Norris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the remedies available under the Virginia Tort Claims Act to be sufficient post- deprivation remedies
• finding inmate’s recovery in federal court for deprivation of liberty foreclosed, because “Virginia provides adequate tort remedies for post-deprivation compensation”
• finding inmate’s recovery in federal court for deprivation of liberty foreclosed, because “Virginia provides adequate tort remedies for post- deprivation compensation”
• finding inmate’s recovery in federal court for deprivation of liberty foreclosed, because “Virginia provides adequate tort remedies for post- deprivation compensation”
• finding inmate’s recovery in federal court for deprivation of liberty foreclosed, because “Virginia provides adequate tort remedies for post-deprivation compensation”
• VTCA and Virginia tort law provide adequate post-deprivation remedies for torts committed by state employees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).