Kimberly K. Graham and Jon S. Graham v. Medical Mutual of Ohio, F/k/a Blue Cross & Blue Shield Mutual of Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a preliminary injunction movant did not show irreparable injury because the evidence did not demonstrate that HDCT was more efficacious than the conventional chemotherapy that the movant was receiving
• affirming the denial of a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff \ha[d] not demonstrated that [she] will suffer irreparable harm by the denial of this injunction\
• affirming the denial of a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff “ha[d] not demonstrated that [she] will suffer ‘irreparable harm’ by the denial of this injunction”
• affirming the denial of a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff “ha[d] not demonstrated that [she] will suffer irreparable harm by the denial of this injunction”
• affirming the denial of a preliminary injunction because the plaintiff “ha[d] not demonstrated that [she] will suffer irreparable harm by the denial of this injunction”
• “Irreparable harm is harm which cannot be repaired, retrieved, put down again, atoned for ….”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).