Kimberly Heaton v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that to revoke a defendant’s probation based on the allegation that he committed a new criminal offense, the trial court must find that the evidence established by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed a new criminal offense
• holding that to revoke a defendant’s probation based on the allegation that he committed a new criminal offense, the trial court must find that the evidence established by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed a new criminal offense
• calling the failure to keep the probation department informed of current address, to obtain a substance abuse evaluation, and to verify employment with the probation department violations that were “technical in nature”
• “[I]f a violation is found, then the trial court must determine the appropriate sanctions for the violation.”
• “[I]f a violation is found, then the trial court must determine the appropriate sanctions for the violation.”
• “[P]robation may be revoked on evidence of violation of a single condition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).