Kimberly Frazier v. Life Insurance Company of North America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no continuous disability where the petitioner “was cleared to return to work” “at least at several points during the [Elimination Period]”
• affirming denial of disability benefits on basis of file review conducted by nurse case manager
• “[N]othing in Section 1101(b)(2) prohibits an insurance policy from being a plan document[.]”
• “This Court has found “satisfactory proof,” and similar phrases, sufficiently clear to grant discretion to administrators and fiduciaries.”
• “[T]here appears to be no reason why an insurance policy cannot be both a plan document and asset.”
• “This Court has found ‘satisfactory proof,’ and similar phrases, sufficiently clear to grant discretion to administrators and fiduciaries.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).