Kimberly-Clark Corporation v. Fort Howard Paper Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[S]tatements in opinions of this court must be read harmoniously with prior precedent, not in isolation.”
• “[A] panel of this court is bound by prior precedential decisions unless and until overturned in banc. Thus, statements in opinions of this court must be read harmoniously with prior precedent, not in isolation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).