Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 11/19/2004
Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Sawyer
Citations
- 901 So. 2d 738
- 2004 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 861
- 2004 WL 2633425
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding, in a workers’ compensation case, that a doctor’s report assessing only three of six factors included in a generally accepted diagnostic standard for asbestosis did not meet the Frye standard and was, therefore, inadmissible
- reversing, based on evidentiary error, the award of benefits for employee’s workplace exposure to asbestos and noting that employer’s mill had complied with OSHA guidelines for permissible limits of exposure to asbestos
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama· 1989-06-23· cited 2,411×
- Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 1996-05-03· cited 428×
- Ex Parte CashSupreme Court of Alabama· 1993-03-12· cited 115×
- Whitsett v. BAMSI, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1994-12-09· cited 107×
- Roberts v. RobertsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2001-05-11· cited 54×
- Ex Parte WesleySupreme Court of Alabama· 1990-09-28· cited 52×
- Nash v. CosbySupreme Court of Alabama· 1991-01-11· cited 37×
- Slay v. Keller Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2001-12-07· cited 23×
- Chinevere v. Cullman CountySupreme Court of Alabama· 1987-02-20· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.