Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Sawyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in a workers’ compensation case, that a doctor’s report assessing only three of six factors included in a generally accepted diagnostic standard for asbestosis did not meet the Frye standard and was, therefore, inadmissible
• reversing, based on evidentiary error, the award of benefits for employee’s workplace exposure to asbestos and noting that employer’s mill had complied with OSHA guidelines for permissible limits of exposure to asbestos

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).