Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Public Service Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when one statute contains a provision and a similar statute omits the same provision, the court must not read in the omitted provision
• “Section 196.37(1) [(1975)] … expressly limits the PSC’s authority to setting rates prospectively only.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).