Skip to main content
· 4/29/2005

Kimball v. Publix Super Markets, Inc.

Citations

  • 901 So. 2d 293
  • 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 6117
  • 2005 WL 991387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court had abused its discretion in denying Kimball's motion to amend its complaint in part because \[t]here was no showing that Publix would suffer prejudice if the motion to amend were granted\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stringer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.