Kimball v. Kimball
Citations
- 174 U.S. 158
- 19 S. Ct. 639
- 43 L. Ed. 932
- 1899 U.S. LEXIS 1490
Syllabus
<p>If the petition of a woman, claiming to be the widow of a man supposed to have died intestate, for the revocation of letters of administration previously granted to his next of kin, and for the grant of such letters to her, is dismissed by the surrogate’s court upon the ground that a decree of divorce obtained by her in another State from a former husband is void; and she appeals from the judgment of dismissal to the highest court of the State, which affirms that judgment; and, pending a writ of error from this court, it is shown that a will of the deceased was proved in the surrogate’s court after its judgment dismissing .her petition, and before her appeal from that judgment'; the writ of error must be dismissed.</p>
Judges: Gray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 1,202×
- Tyler v. Judges of the Court of RegistrationSupreme Court· 1900-12-17· cited 164×
- La Salle National Bank v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court· 1954-05-24· cited 152×
- Cover v. SchwartzSecond Circuit· 1942-12-17· cited 117×
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. DennisSupreme Court· 1912-04-29· cited 80×
- Missouri Ex Rel. Wabash Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court· 1927-01-17· cited 62×
- Panama R. v. JohnsonSecond Circuit· 1923-02-15· cited 56×
- Ward v. CharltonSupreme Court of Virginia· 1941-01-13· cited 49×
- Wick v. Chicago Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court· 1917-02-21· cited 32×
- State ex rel. Beacon Journal Publishing Co. v. KainradOhio Supreme Court· 1976-06-08· cited 29×
- Fortson v. ToombsSupreme Court· 1965-01-18· cited 25×
- Queensboro Farms Products, Inc. v. WickardSecond Circuit· 1943-07-19· cited 23×
- Berg v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1968-06-19· cited 22×
- Queensboro Farms Products v. WickardSecond Circuit· 1943-08-13· cited 18×
- Keely v. Ophir Hill Consol. Mining Co.Eighth Circuit· 1909-04-23· cited 18×
- Southern Pac. Co. v. EshelmanN.D. California· 1914-05-26· cited 17×
- Sessa v. Board of Assessors of North ElbaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-12-20· cited 16×
- In re KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1981-06-15· cited 16×
- Pagel v. MacLeanSupreme Court· 1931-04-13· cited 13×
- Margaret De Korwin, Etc. v. The First National Bank of Chicago, Etc., the First National Bank of Chicago, Trustee, Etc. v. Samuel A. RinellaFirst Circuit· 1956-06-22· cited 12×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mills v. GreenSupreme Court· 1895-11-25· cited 1,019×
- California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court· 1893-05-10· cited 336×
- Dakota County v. GliddenSupreme Court· 1885-01-26· cited 114×
- San Mateo County v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1885-12-21· cited 51×
- In Re the Application for Letters of Administration of the Goods, Chattels and CreditsNew York Court of Appeals· 1898-02-04· cited 38×
- Washington Market Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court· 1890-10-27· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.