Kimball v. E. A. Rosenham Co.
Citations
- 114 F. 85
- 52 C.C.A. 33
- 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4064
Syllabus
<p>3. Bankruptcy — Payments on Account Current no Peeiterenois Wiiekh Subsequent Credits Exceed Them.</p> <p>The receipt by a creditor of payments upon an account current in the usual course of business, which are followed by new credits for property delivered to the debtor which becomes a part of his estate, for which the creditor is not paid, and which equals or exceeds in amount and value the payments, does not constitute a preference, under section (iOa, and does not require the creditor to surrender such payments as a condition of the allowance of his claim, under section 57g, of the bankrupt act of 1898.</p> <p>2. Same — Creditor’s Claim on Account Current not Divisible,</p> <p>The claim of a creditor for a balance due upon an account current with the bankrupt is one single claim, and, in determining its allowance and the existence of alleged preferences arising out of the acts it evidences, it must be so considered. It may not be divided iuto its items or into separate claims for that purpose.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding nearly 80 years ago that the deadline is a condition precedent and therefore jurisdictional-a mechanical rationale the Supreme Court has since rejected
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Caldwell, Sanborn, Thayer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.