Kimball v. Baker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying pre-IIRIRA version of INA to determine lack of jurisdiction to address motion to reopen 1991 deportation proceedings
• Board does not have jurisdiction to entertain motion to reopen proceedings following alien’s deportation pursuant to those proceedings
• “[T]he regulation presumably contemplates not just the automatic grant of a motion to terminate, but an informed adjudication by the Immigration Judge or this Board based on an evaluation of the factors underlying the Service’s motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).