Kiman v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “(w]hen the decision being challenged is simply a reasoned medical judgment with which the patient disagrees,” the ADA does not apply (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• observing that other circuits have found Title II inapplicable to individual conduct
• denying summary judgment to defendants on failure-to- accommodate claim because prison did not give access to shower chair or lower bunk
• finding genuine issues of material fact on ADA claims existed where plaintiff “presented evidence that corrections officers prevented him from using the shower chair or accessible shower facilities despite his repeated requests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).