Kim v. U.S. Air, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “the ability of litigants to retain loyal counsel of their choice” is a relevant factor in deciding whether to disqualify
• collecting cases when district courts in the Third Circuit “den[ied] disqualification even when finding or assuming conflicts under the professional conduct rules,” including violations of the applicable concurrent conflict rule
• “The conduct of attorneys practicing in federal court is governed by the local rules of the court.”
• “When the requirements necessary for standing at the start of a case disappear, it becomes moot and no longer satisfies Article III’s case-or-controversy requirement[.]”
• “Even when an ethical conflict exists (or is assumed to exist), a court may conclude based on the facts before it that disqualification is not an appropriate remedy.”
• “Even when an ethical conflict exists (or is assumed to exist), a court may conclude based on the facts before it that disqualification is not an appropriate remedy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).