Skip to main content
· 1/13/1989

Kim v. Peoples Federal S & L Ass'n

Citations

  • 538 So. 2d 867
  • 1989 WL 2432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the language in a promissory note was not broad enough to require the guarantor to pay for the attorney's fees incurred in enforcing the guaranty agreement
  • holding that the language in a promissory note was not broad enough to require the guarantor to pay for the attorney’s fees incurred in enforcing the guaranty agreement
  • where antecedent note provided for attorneys’ fees but guaranty did not, lower court erred to allow attorneys’ fees in suit enforcing guaranty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shivers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.