Kim v. Park Hill Owners, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that father’s rights to child could not be posthumously terminated because purpose of termination is to allow for child to be adopted and stating “it logically follows the statute only addresses circumstances when the child is still living.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).