Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 7/27/2004

Kim v. Ashcroft

Citations

  • 340 F. Supp. 2d 384
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14397
  • 2004 WL 1687201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion to dismiss where plaintiff had waited four years for adjudication of his application
  • “[T]he CIS simply does not possess unfettered discretion to relegate aliens to a state of ‘limbo,’ leaving them to languish there indefinite ly.”
  • court has subject matter 4 jurisdiction under the APA to determine whether a 42-month delay in adjudicating an immigration- related petition is unreasonable
  • “[W]here a plaintiff alleges that the defendant violated the APA, the court may exercise subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to section 1331.”
  • “[T]he [US]CIS simply does not possess unfettered discretion to relegate aliens to a state of ‘limbo,’ leaving them to languish there indefinitely.”
  • “Although it is entirely possible that th[e] delay is reasonable, there is insufficient information upon which to base such a determination at this stage in the proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.