Kim Suk v. Sook H. Chang

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dissolution judgments that contain internal inconsistencies must be -6- reversed so the inconsistencies can be corrected
• \[D]issolution judgments that contain internal inconsistencies must be reversed so the inconsistencies can be corrected.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• ANTHONY v. DISTEFANO v. ANDREA L. DISTEFANO
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-15· cited 2×
• SERAP FREDERICK v. TIMOTHY FREDERICK
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-09-14· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gallardo v. Gallardo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-24· cited 20×
• Mahaffey v. Mahaffey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-24· cited 13×
• Meyer v. Meyer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-05-18· cited 13×
• Brewer v. Brewer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-20· cited 9×
• Allen v. Allen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-06-13· cited 5×
• Gibson v. Gibson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-10-12· cited 1×