Kim Shultz v. Bryan Buchanan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “plaintiffs failed 10 to identify a contract provision requiring defendants to grant them a permanent loan 11 modification” because there was no such provision
• district court properly dismissed breach of contract claim because plaintiffs “failed to identify a contract provision” imposing legally enforceable obligations upon defendants
• “The district court properly dismissed the claim for breach of contract because 7 plaintiffs failed to identify a contract provision requiring defendants to grant them a permanent 8 loan modification . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).