Kim Michael Fonder, Sr. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that most bankruptcy courts equate ability to fund Chapter 13 plan with ability to repay at least fifty percent of unsecured debt in three to five years
• ability to fund a Chapter 13 plan where debtor could pay 89% of unsecured debt in 3 years or 100% in five years
• \Oral findings and conclusions . . . must be liberally construed and found to be in consonance with the judgment if the judgment has support in the record evidence.\
• “[T]he essential inquiry remains whether the debtor’s ability to repay creditors with future income is sufficient to make the Chapter 7 liquidating bankruptcy a substantial abuse of the Code. We have never held that, to be dismissed under § 707(b
• 89% over 3 years and 100% over 5 years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).