Kim M. Indoranto v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ \must confront the evidence that does not support his conclusion and explain why it was rejected\
• finding that the ALJ “must confront the evidence that does not support his conclusion and explain why it was rejected.”
• remanding for ALJ to consider how claimant’s headaches and blurred vision affected her ability to work
• noting an ALJ “must confront the evidence that does not support his conclusion and explain why it was rejected”
• reversing and remanding in part because the ALJ relied on hypothetical to VE that did not include the claimant’s blurred vision or headaches
• remanding where the ALJ failed to discuss how the plaintiff’s headaches affected her ability to work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).