Kim J. Washington, Katrina J. Williams v. Elrick Earl Johnson (Appeal from Baldwin Circuit Court: CV-22-900835).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that conspiracy actions should not be dismissed because they are \conclusory\ or because they fail to specify an overt act
• stating that conspiracy actions should not be dismissed because they are \conclusory\ or because they fail to specify an overt act
• explaining that a conspiracy allegation must provide sufficient notice to “enable [a defendant] to prepare his defense . . .”
• explaining that if it becomes “apparent in the course of the litigation that there was no overt act, the plaintiff’s suit would have to be dismissed”
• explaining that “Appropriate caution in [exercising the authority to dismiss under § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii
• finding that “when the existence of a valid affirmative defense is so plain from the face of the complaint that the suit can be regarded as frivolous, the district judge need not wait for an answer before dismissing the suit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).