Skip to main content
· 10/23/2000

Kim Adams v. Ameritech Services, Inc. And Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc., and Deborah Allard v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 231 F.3d 414
  • 55 Fed. R. Serv. 1144
  • 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1101
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 26638
  • 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,297
  • 84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant's objections that the analysis did not control for outside factors went to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility
  • noting evidence is not usually excluded under Rule 403 at the summary judgment stage
  • “Two standard deviations is normally enough to show that it is extremely unlikely (that is, there is less than a 5% probability
  • “[T]he question before us is not whether the [expert] reports proffered by the plaintiffs prove the entire case . . . . No one piece of evidence has to prove every element of the plaintiffs’ case . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Ripple, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.