· 10/23/2000
Kim Adams v. Ameritech Services, Inc. And Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc., and Deborah Allard v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc.
Citations
- 231 F.3d 414
- 55 Fed. R. Serv. 1144
- 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1101
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 26638
- 79 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,297
- 84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 178
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the defendant's objections that the analysis did not control for outside factors went to the weight of the evidence, not its admissibility
- noting evidence is not usually excluded under Rule 403 at the summary judgment stage
- “Two standard deviations is normally enough to show that it is extremely unlikely (that is, there is less than a 5% probability
- “[T]he question before us is not whether the [expert] reports proffered by the plaintiffs prove the entire case . . . . No one piece of evidence has to prove every element of the plaintiffs’ case . . . .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Ripple, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.