Skip to main content
· 12/12/2019

Kiluk v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Any abuse of discretion is reviewed for harmless error, 10 and a new trial is required only when the admission of evidence affected the substantial rights of a party.”
  • evaluating admission of expert opinion for harmless error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.