Arizona Supreme Court· 2/27/1970

Kilpatrick v. Superior Court

Citations

466 P.2d 18
105 Ariz. 413
1970 Ariz. LEXIS 282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that \constitutions must be construed as a whole and their various parts must be read together\
recognizing that “constitutions must be construed as a whole and their various parts must be read together”
holding that, under former worker’s compensation statutes, employee had right of action against fellow employee for injuries sustained in course of employment
stating that “[without] room for quibbling” and “[w]ithout limitation” the anti-abrogation clause “confers the right to recover damages for injuries as existing under the common law”
observing that “we would be compelled to construe [two sections of the Arizona constitution] together for constitutions must be construed as a whole and their various parts read together”
invalidating under article 2, section 31 a statute limiting the liability of an employee for injury inflicted on a co-employee to the amount allowed by compensation benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Struckmeyer, Lockwood, Udall, Mc-Farland, Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.