Skip to main content
· 3/9/1891

Kilpatrick v. Penna. R. Co.

Citations

  • 140 Pa. 502
  • 21 A. 408
  • 1891 Pa. LEXIS 864

Syllabus

<p>1. A passenger, who, without necessity, attempts to alight from a moving train, in the face of a warning from a fellow passenger not to do so, is guilty of contributory negligence, and cannot recover for an injury received in such attempt.</p> <p>2. While not bound to obey such a warning, the person warned disregards it at his peril, from whatever source it comes. It is enough that Ms attention is drawn to his danger; it then becomes Ms duty to avoid it, and not to do so is negligence.</p> <p>8. Wherefore, it is not error, in an action for an injury received in alighting from a train, to charge that, if the train was in motion and the plaintiff was informed of that fact by a fellow passenger, and warned not to alight, it was his duty to heed the warning.</p>

Judges: Clark, Green, Paxson, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.