Skip to main content
· 3/24/2010

Kilmer v. Elexco Land Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 990 A.2d 1147
  • 605 Pa. 413
  • 175 Oil & Gas Rep. 226
  • 2010 Pa. LEXIS 517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that states adopting the marketable product rule “have done so as a matter of common law in interpreting ambiguities in leases, not through statutory interpretation of a preexisting statute.”
  • recognizing that while prices further downstream may be higher, costs increase as well and those post-production costs must be netted out in order to determine sale price at wellhead to ensure proper evaluation of gas value and determination
  • explaining that transformation of raw (sour) gas into marketable natural gas (sweet gas) increases price/value of gas
  • explaining that if a royalty is ‘free of’ certain costs, those costs are not deducted
  • recognizing states adopting marketable product rule “have done so as a matter of common law in interpreting ambiguities in leases, not through statutory interpretation of a preexisting statute.”
  • recognizing states adopting marketable product rule “have done so as a matter of common law in interpreting ambiguities in leases, not through statutory interpretation of a preexisting statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Greenspan, Former

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.