Killo v. Bethlehem Associates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that draft answers to interrogatories have retained their protected status and are not subject to discovery, even though the final draft is intended to be submitted
• “[S]haring work product material with a friendly party does not waive the work product protection as it applies to an adverse third party.”
• “an attorney cannot avoid a deposition by asserting that [there is] ... no relevant, nonprivileged information ... at a minimum, the attorney must submit to a deposition” and any lack of knowledge will be tested and any claimed privilege will be placed on the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).