Killion v. Franklin Regional School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the school overstepped its constitutional bounds under Tinker when it suspended a student for making “lewd” comments about the school’s athletic director in an e-mail the student wrote at home and circulated to the non-school email accounts of several classmates
• holding that the court need not consider plaintiff's argument that a heightened standard applies to speech occurring off school grounds because \[t]he overwhelming weight of authority has analyzed student speech (whether on or off campus) in accordance with Tinker \
• holding that the court need not consider plaintiffs argument that a heightened standard applies to speech occurring off school grounds because “[t]he overwhelming weight of authority has analyzed student speech (whether on or off campus) in accordance with Tinker ”
• holding that the school overstepped its constitutional bounds under Tinker when it suspended a student for making “lewd” comments about the school’s athletic director in an email the student wrote at home and circulated to the non-school e-mail accounts of several classmates
• holding that the school overstepped its constitutional bounds under Tinker when it suspended a student for making \lewd\ comments about the school's athletic director in an e-mail the student wrote at home and circulated to the non-school e-mail accounts of several classmates
• applying Tinker to “top-ten” list authored by a student off-campus, and taken on-campus by others without his express instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).