Supreme Court of Georgia· 9/22/2014
Kilgore v. State
Citations
- 295 Ga. 729
- 763 S.E.2d 685
- 2014 Ga. LEXIS 736
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that phone records were admissible under the business records exception to the hearsay rule
- holding that cell phone records “were admissible under the business records exception to the hearsay rule”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
- Malcolm v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 1,049×
- Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2003-06-02· cited 102×
- Tolver v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1998-05-18· cited 51×
- Suarez v. SuarezSupreme Court of Georgia· 1987-05-19· cited 27×
- Hurst v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2009-04-28· cited 17×
- Santana v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2007-02-22· cited 14×
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2013-10-21· cited 14×
- Davis v. Harpagon Co.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2008-05-19· cited 9×
- Armstrong v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-11-20· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.