Kilgore Development, Inc. v. Woodland Place, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that subdivision-control statutes were implemented to protect the public, not to raise revenue, and that contracts violating those statutes are accordingly void
• holding that “a contract obtained in violation of the subdivision control statutes is void”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).