Kilcullen v. Calbom & Schwab, PSC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing how a trial court has the authority to excuse a condition where enforcing the condition would cause disproportionate forfeiture
• “A trial court has the authority to excuse a condition to performance . . . where enforcing the condition would cause disproportionate forfeiture.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Capistrant v. Lifetouch Nat'l Sch. Studios, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2018-07-25· cited 19×
• David Martin v. Gonzaga University
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2017-09-07

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Washington Supreme Court· 1989-03-30· cited 914×
• Hisle v. Todd Pacific Shipyards Corp.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 278×
• Jones v. Allstate Insurance
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-05-09· cited 262×
• Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-05-09· cited 252×
• Condon v. Condon
  Washington Supreme Court· 2013-03-21· cited 79×
• King County v. Taxpayers of King County
  Washington Supreme Court· 1997-06-13· cited 53×
• Spooner v. Reserve Life Insurance
  Washington Supreme Court· 1955-09-15· cited 42×
• Refrigeration Engineering Co. v. McKay
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1971-05-13· cited 42×
• DeWolfe v. French
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1864-07-01· cited 25×
• Duckworth v. Langland
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-11-23· cited 23×
• Cavell v. Hughes
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-06-12· cited 21×
• Crown Plaza Corp. v. Synapse Software System, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1997-08-25· cited 16×
• Pegg v. Olson
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 1924-02-18· cited 12×
• Plese-Graham, LLC v. Loshbaugh
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-10-27· cited 10×