Kilby v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Commonwealth’s delayed disclosure expert “clearly ha[d] ‘a degree of knowledge of a subject matter beyond that of persons of common intelligence and ordinary experience’” (quoting Conley v. Commonwealth, 273 Va. 554, 560 (2007))
• holding that the Commonwealth’s delayed disclosure expert “clearly ha[d] ‘a degree of knowledge of a subject matter beyond that of persons of common intelligence and ordinary experience’” (quoting Conley v. Commonwealth, 273 Va. 554, 560 (2007))
• holding that the Commonwealth’s delayed disclosure expert “clearly ha[d] ‘a degree of knowledge of a subject matter beyond that of persons of common intelligence and ordinary experience’” (quoting Conley v. Commonwealth, 273 Va. 554, 560 (2007))
• noting the Commonwealth’s expert on delayed disclosures clearly had greater knowledge of that subject matter than persons of common intelligence and ordinary experience
• distinguishing Davison based on the expert witness’ extensive experience and training

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).