Skip to main content
· 12/10/1982

Kilburn v. Pineda

Citations

  • 137 Cal. App. 3d 1046
  • 187 Cal. Rptr. 548
  • 1982 Cal. App. LEXIS 2199

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • plaintiff was not put on inquiry notice of malpractice, as a matter of law, even though she could not walk or stand after three back operations
  • limitations period for professional malpractice against the defendant doctor held to run from the date \a reasonable person in the plaintiff's position should have recognized there existed a basis for a malpractice action\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown (Gerald)

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.