Skip to main content
· 10/19/1988

Kihlstadius v. Nodaway Veterinary Clinic

Citations

  • 697 F. Supp. 1087
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11772
  • 1988 WL 113180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that 60(b) “motions must be directed in the first instance to the district court” as opposed to the appeals court because district courts “ha[ve] heard all of the evidence in a case”
  • “[The] proper approach to 9 seeking relief from judgment because of a change in the factual 10 circumstances surrounding this case would be to make a Rule 60(b
  • relief under Rule 60(b)(6) proper where Federal Trade Commission decisions constituted “new fact[s] not in existence at the time of trial” and “affect[ed] the factual circumstances surrounding the case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.