Kifafi v. Hilton Hotels Retirement Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that over time, some participants in fact recovered from any benefits deficiency they may have initially suffered
• “Plaintiff would also seek an audit of termination dates of “12/31” to determine whether they are actual termination dates or merely placeholders in the records.”
• “Plaintiff would also seek an audit of termination dates of “12/31” to determine whether they are actual termination dates or merely placeholders in the records.”
• “The Court previously ruled that it would not expand Plaintiff’s union service claim to include all ‘non- participating’ service because Kifafi never moved to expand the scope of the subclass and the 6 Court never certified a ‘non-participating service’ subclass.”
• denying Plaintiffs monitoring plan as too intrusive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).