Kiev v. Glickman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that such reliance on Foley “ignores those essential reasons that have distinguished state alien-age classifications from similar federal classifications”
• stating that “the Welfare Reform Act does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fifth Amendment, as it is rationally related to legitimate governmental interests”
• “Were this Court addressing the issue on a ‘clean state,’ such an argument may have merit- However, ... the slate is not clean.”
• rational basis analysis used to find welfare reform act did not violate equal protection

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).