Kiesel v. Kiesel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court was justified in continuing support payments to a child beyond her twenty-first birthday where child lacked the capacity to earn a living (citing Utah Code Ann. § 78-45-1, -2 (1953
• Father may not intentionally escape child support obligations by channeling money into unprofitable businesses.
• father may not intentionally escape child support obligations by channeling money into unprofitable businesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).