Skip to main content
· 2/20/2001

Kielczynski v. United States Central Intelligence Agency

Citations

  • 128 F. Supp. 2d 151
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1854
  • 2001 WL 173322

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting argument that constitutional claims arising from contract for secret services fall outside of Totten doctrine
  • rejecting argument that constitutional claims arising from contract for secret services fall outside of Totten doctrine
  • rejecting a former covert employee's argument that the source of his rights was the due process clause and finding instead that his cause of action was ultimately based on his contract with the CIA
  • rejecting a former covert employee’s argument that the source of his rights was the due process clause and finding instead that his cause of action was ultimately based on his contract with the CIA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glasser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.