· 2/20/2001
Kielczynski v. United States Central Intelligence Agency
Citations
- 128 F. Supp. 2d 151
- 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1854
- 2001 WL 173322
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument that constitutional claims arising from contract for secret services fall outside of Totten doctrine
- rejecting argument that constitutional claims arising from contract for secret services fall outside of Totten doctrine
- rejecting a former covert employee's argument that the source of his rights was the due process clause and finding instead that his cause of action was ultimately based on his contract with the CIA
- rejecting a former covert employee’s argument that the source of his rights was the due process clause and finding instead that his cause of action was ultimately based on his contract with the CIA
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Glasser
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.