Kiehl v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• police tape of defendant’s conversation with counsel, although improper, did nothing to impair defendant’s consultation and therefore did not affect defendant’s decision to take breath test
• because police misconduct did not result in deprivation of defendant’s statutory right to consult an attorney, exclusionary rule did not apply
• because the surreptitious recording did not impair defendant’s consultation with counsel, the police misconduct did not affect the ensuing breath test and thus was not a product of the police impropriety
• because the surreptitious recording did not impair defendant's consultation with counsel, the police misconduct did not affect the ensuing breath test and thus was not a product of the police impropriety

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).