· 12/24/1987
Kiehl v. Action Manufacturing Co.
Citations
- 535 A.2d 571
- 517 Pa. 183
- 1987 Pa. LEXIS 874
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refusing to disregard the corporate form between parents and subsidiaries when applying workmen's compensation laws
- refusing to disregard the corporate form between parents and subsidiaries when applying workmen’s compensation laws
- refusing to disregard the corporate form between parents and subsidiaries when applying workmen's compensation laws
- disallowing subsidiary from piercing parent’s veil shield itself from liability under workman’s compensation law
- employee furthered functions of subsidiary even though his work also indirectly benefitted parent
- adhering to the same standard for piercing the corporate veil
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nix, Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.