Kieburtz & Associates, Inc. v. Rehn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Washington] courts have referenced the Restatement (Second) of Agency in many prior cases ... [and] our courts have accepted rules of agency which are similar to the rule outlined in section 393”
• “[Washington] courts have referenced the Restatement (Second) of Agency in many prior cases ... [and] our courts have accepted rules of agency which are similar to the rule outlined in section 393”
• “During the 14 period of his or her employment, an employee is not ‘entitled to solicit customers for [a] rival 15 business . . .’ or to act in direct competition with his or her employer’s business.” (quoting 16 Restatement (Second) of Agency § 393 cmt. e (1958))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).