· 1/11/1996
Kidwell v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 670 A.2d 349
- 1996 D.C. App. LEXIS 19
- 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,892
- 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1263
- 1996 WL 40276
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \[The filing] deadline is tolled `until the facts that would support a charge of discrimination under Title VII were apparent or should have been apparent....'\
- “[The filing] deadline is tolled ‘until the facts that would support a charge of discrimination under Title VII were apparent or should have been apparent_’”
- Under the discovery rule, the statute of limitations “is tolled until the facts that would support a [claim] . . . were apparent or should have been apparent to a person with a reasonably prudent regard for his rights.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- non-jurisdictional restrictions are subject to waiver
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwelb, Farrell, Reid
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.