Skip to main content
· 1/11/1996

Kidwell v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 670 A.2d 349
  • 1996 D.C. App. LEXIS 19
  • 67 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 43,892
  • 69 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1263
  • 1996 WL 40276

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \[The filing] deadline is tolled `until the facts that would support a charge of discrimination under Title VII were apparent or should have been apparent....'\
  • “[The filing] deadline is tolled ‘until the facts that would support a charge of discrimination under Title VII were apparent or should have been apparent_’”
  • Under the discovery rule, the statute of limitations “is tolled until the facts that would support a [claim] . . . were apparent or should have been apparent to a person with a reasonably prudent regard for his rights.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • non-jurisdictional restrictions are subject to waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwelb, Farrell, Reid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.