Kidsco Inc. v. Dinsmore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “where a corporation’s by-laws put all on notice that the by-laws may be amended at any time, no vested rights can arise that would contractually prohibit an amendment”
• explaining that “where a corporation’s by-laws put all on notice that the by-laws may be amended at any time, no vested rights can arise that would contractually prohibit an amendment”
• applying Unocal to a bylaw amendment that extended the minimum allowable time for calling a stockholder-initiated special meeting from 35 days to 60 days
• “[Tjhis Court has held that where a corporation's by-laws put all on notice that the by-laws may be amended at any time, no vested rights can arise that would contractually prohibit an amendment.”
• “[W]here a corporation’s by-laws put all on notice that the by-laws may be amended at any time, no vested rights can arise that would contractually prohibit an amendment.”
• “In neither case would the amendment perpetuate the current board in office.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).